I would say opera's small userbase is due to them not marketing there product like the others do! Not at all to it being down to the internet suite. Not only that security and privacy is lax. safari 4 is faster than op but the end build is likely to be a buggy, memory consuming piece of crap like the rest. Your point about firefox being secure is nonsense due to this! Firefox is also ugly and looks like a windows 3.1 program. chrome seems ok for a few uses but far too basic, lacks security and privacy! I also (like firefox) see exploits come out for chrome weekly this is unacceptable. There is also a recent test done (i will post the result here when i find it) Which shows opera 10(1345) beats all the firefoxes hands down bar 3.5? never heard of that one! This is not a silly js test it records load times of pages while you browse around for 30 minutes or so. Its based on my testing all of them, opera if configured properly destroys memory hog firefox. And I think the Opera user base is nowhere near as small as you're making it out to be. I think there is one slavish fanboy and narrow minded application basher here. It does still have many moments of lag in page update speeds where I never have that with Opera. Opera does all that Firefox plus Thunderbird and a few other things do, in significantly less memory, and generally much faster. Yes, I do still use Firefox a lot, I still like it, and I still have many add-ons that I really like having in Firefox, but it is not the same in memory use at all.Īdd a similar memory experience with Thunderbird and my 1Gb of memory on XP does not go far at all. In Firefox, minimizing makes no difference at all, and over time, memory use actually creeps up because of memory leaks. Memory utilization does not go up in Opera, when I minimize, it goes down to 10 - 20Mb. The exact same tabs open in both will use 180Mb in Firefox (every version, alpha, beta and stable), while in Opera the same tabs will use 80 - 120Mb at most. Try using it seriously, for just two or three days, with anything from 3 - 10 tabs open. I have always been a fan of Firefox, but compared to Opera, it is a bloated pig in memory use. I am no slavish fanboy, I use what is best, fastest, most efficient. I have tabs open to my server monitoring systems, time/project management, igoogle, gmail, google reader, and a few other internal work related sites. _3.3-build-043_insecure_dll_hijacking_(wintab32.Carbonize, I use browsers all day, every day. This vulnerability was discovered by Aung Khant,, YGN Please see workaround solution links in References section. Disable loading of libraries from WebDAV and remote network shares Users to protect increasing mass exploitation of this However, it is suggested that the following workarounds be deployed by In network shares, usb drives, file sharing networks,įixed version from the vendor has not been released yet. Library file made as hidden attribute and a seemingly interesting file Number of ways such as placing a malicious external When a user opens its associated file with extensions - htm, html, mhtml.Īttackers can trigger a successful exploit against a victim user in a In loading an external library, "wintab32.dll" The QtWeb Browser application passes an insufficiently qualified path WebKit rendering engine used in Apple Safari It's open source project based on Nokia's Qt framework and Apple's Unique user interface and privacy features thatįills the gaps in most of players on browsers market QtWeb Browser is a lightweight, secure and portable browser having Have been come up with Remote Binary Planting, and Insecure DLL Similar terms that describe this vulnerability The QtWeb Browser application is vulnerable to Insecure DLL Hijacking By Thread QtWeb Browser version 3.3 build 043 Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (wintab32.dll)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |